Plus working in the SEO industry for almost 5 years now. To some I am simply a young pup, but I have to say the results we get from your SEO promotions speak for themselves. Presseartikel
At the time you work in this field of SEO you have a tendency to network with other SEO professionals and stay tuned with the latest SEO waves or revisions from Google. You also connect to other SEO experts in the message boards and blogs.
I want to express my panic about the amount of complexity added to the main topic of SEO. About 80% details on SEO out there exists too deep and intricate, with an awful whole lot of opinions.
Similar to technology or methodology, people are looking for user friendliness. They want a thing that works, creates an effect or makes a difference. This same idea is applicable to SEO.
Using a technology requires sticking with the basics of that technology. If you sort through the a large number of available “sources” you usually can locate the real source, which is the information and method one should use when doing exercises how to go about it. This is actually the correct way to learn and apply nearly anything.
I find it amazing how some SEO experts throw their opinions away on their high-powered personal blogs, only to confuse another thousand SEO experts.
That is laughable to watch, and it goes like this:
SEO Expert May well, needs to get “green carrots” on page you of Google for a client.
He could be working on it for months, book-marking, social networks, links and many others.
After 2-3 months this individual requires a step back and looks at his traveler and keyword stats. Not really much change, he seriously isn’t getting the results fantastic client is starting to wonder.
Suddenly he knows a cool video on YouTube may boost things up and get’s this produced an online.
The subsequent week “green carrots” is on page 1! Really great, it worked and the customer is all happy.
Following staking it slowly calm and looking at his results, he suddenly understands that he never optimized the content of his page with enough keywords. Oops. He only stated “green carrots” once and still got a web page 1 result. This happens him as strange and it seems to abuse everything he learned about page optimisation in SEO.
What goes on next is interesting. The SEO expert determines this is valuable information and experience. He has just seen the pursuing new search rule in play, which should be distributed to anyone doing SEO:
“Google is no longer giving any value to keyword density. This kind of plays no part in SEO. ”
He creates a nice 1000 phrase article about it and due to his experience, is extremely certain of his findings. He even makes a jab at Google about no bringing up it to anyone. Nowadays he has kudos for locating this out before someone else.
This is extremely frustrating for everyone who is wants to learn the subject of SEO or even old school SEO professionals. Which is for that reason short-sightedness that the internet is filled with millions of pages about SEO which would much better found in the trash.
Now no longer get me wrong, I actually is not talking about the various very useful articles, digests and tutorials away there which can greatly assist an SEO expert to get his job done faster. I have always been talking about those people who create their own interpretations of precisely what is an extremely specific and logical technology – SEO.
Adding confusion to the subject
Excellent real example of this. The other day I read and article from a “leading SEO source”, Seomoz. In their article The Basics of Search Engine Friendly Design and style and Development, they point out loud and bold that:
“Keyword density is, without question, Not just a part of modern web website positioning codes for the simple reason that it provides considerably worse results than many other, more complex methods of keyword analysis. “