There have been a spate of security flaws across an amount of tech applications and software over the earlier twelve months, the most significant being Sony’s meltdown when hackers claimed to have stolen as many as 2. 2 million credit card details from the roughly 70 million users across the PlayStation network. How to see other people’s Snapchats
The most recent software to fall season foul of such a security breach is the infamous Snapchat. For the uninitiated, Snapchat is an software the allows users to share photographs with friends that instantly fade away without a trace after 1-10 seconds, depending on deliverers settings.
Hackers have now collected usernames and mobile phone numbers of around 4. 6 million users, having exposed a security distance in the ‘Find Friends’ feature, which was obviously in the middle of the breach. Christopher Soghoian, principal technologist with the American Civil Liberties Unification, exposed what he thinks to be a much more distressing problem, in that they “demonstrated a cavalier frame of mind about privacy and security”, following reports that security experts had warned the organization on at least two separate occasions, about a vulnerability in its system.
What is truly disturbing is the precedence that these security flaws seem to be to set for not only existing software but future companies updates as well. What measures can we take to ensure that our sensitive information isn’t hacked, sold and distributed across the web?
Gartner security analyst Avivah Litan said phone quantities were not considered “sensitive” personally identifiable information – such as credit greeting card or social security amounts – so they are collected by a number of companies to verify someone’s personality.
A phone number is “not as bad as password or magnetic remove information, but it’s the piece of the challenge that criminals need to impersonate identities”, she said.
However, according to a new report by Forrester Research, mobile security hazards are moving to applications, mimicking the traditional processing space in which security and risk professionals first targeted networks and devices and then progressed to applications.
The Forrester Analysis report cites three reasons for directing security to apps:
1. Security and risk professionals have little control over mobile sites, devices and OSs. Main system vulnerabilities show no connection to the number of threats against them, information Forrester, citing “Symantec Net Security Threat Report 2013. ” The most notable layer of security stack, therefore, is the primary point of risk within mobile.
2. Employees are using multiple personal devices at the office, home and while travelling to view private and strategic corporate data.
3. Mobile software are up to date more frequently than traditional PC applications, so that it is hard for security and risk personnel to keep up with the rapid speed of device expansion.
In spite of clear concerns across the Snapchat community, this latest hack is claimed to be without malicious purpose; in an argument emailed to website TechCrunch, the cyber criminals said: “Our motivation in back of the release was heading to raise the open public awareness about the issue”.
While technology enthusiasts, we’re all aware of the risks the internet poses in exposing sensitive information; but with increasing fears about the levels of security in start-ups and proven brands alike, people are becoming wary of what personal details should be submitted and where.
The growing spotlight on security concerns will hopefully prompt a renewed focus in protecting against hackers from repeating the same feat in future, however for CEO Evan Spiegel and Co. is it a case of too little, too late? Or perhaps in true Snapchat fashion, are users destined to wipe this latest distance from other memory altogether?