Comic Book Industry Blunders

What has gone wrong within the industry and can it be fixed? The rape and pillage, in the eyes of
some, may have left the comic book industry gasping for air for life support. This seems that for an
industry that has seen so much success, a brief history of comic books, has apparently been
confounded by seemingly dumb mistakes. Comic book

The first could have very well been the coining of the name “comic books”. The earliest variations
of the so-called half-tab (for half tabloid) reprints of the Sunday funnies (the comics) became 
known as “comic books”. This kind of led to the considering on the whole, that comic literature contained amusing
or funny material, which we all know, is a much stretch from reality. Comedian book heroes can be very
somber, dark or adventurous magazines. It has often been suggested that there ought to be another
term coined to higher describe this literary package deal we all know as comic books. Currently, no
other user-friend term has been suggested use with the comic book industry.

A second misdirection emerged when magazine prices began to rise. Instead of increasing comic
book prices, like other successful publications did, the comic reserve industry decided to lower pages to
keep the then current price marking of 10 cents. This kind of brought on the impression that comic books
were “cheap” by definition, and neglected the fact that a dime was a lot of money at one time
(steak & eggs cost 35 cents). This presented the that comic books were simply for kids. It
also made the product increasingly less viable for retail retailers to stock. Why take the
same shelf space, if a higher priced mag would do more effectively. Again the perceived
value of the comic publication was losing credibility.

Then simply as the 1950s folded around, a person by the name of Dr. Frederick Wertham, published
a publication entitled “Seduction of the Innocents”. By making use of unscientific research and
assumptions, he explained that all the country’s ills were directly related to kids reading amusing book heroes
(ah hmm, what? ). Central to his thesis, was the misassumption that comic reserve heroes were strictly for
kids. The more mature material, it was irrationally assumed, was aimed at our sweet, na? empieza
innocent children. Yes, we do have to protect our kids, but it still bothers me to no end, that
certain self-righteous individuals believe their lot in life is to help make the rest of the globe adhere
for their own personal beliefs. If this were the case, then our great country would have never recently been

With this wildly illogical attack on the comedian book industry and many congressional leaders
joining the club, amusing books were gaining a poor reputation. The comic newsletter
industry publishers at this point, would have joined together and declared that comic books, like
films, were not “just for kids”. It should have been explained that the wide range of witty book
genres represented was target to as extensive a range of viewers. Basically one of the web publishers
(William Gaines, writer of EC Comics) buckled under to this Congressional Investigation and
the Amusing Code Authority was created. This governed this article of comic books and ascertained
that for the next 15 years or so, the literary content would not rise much furthermore of pablum for
your head. Therefore another slide into incredibility for the comedian book industry took place.

Can your comic reserve industry be saved? Extremely possibly, nevertheless the individuals in charge of the
saving are as anxious as ever to make the same mistakes all over again, what will the outcome be?
They will don’t even seem to be cleaver enough to make new mistakes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *